Poetics Of Imagination Review

Kendall Walton’s Mimesis as Make-Believe (1990) offers a complementary analytic framework: fictions are props in games of make-believe. When we read “the monster lurks,” we imagine that a proposition is true in the fictional world. Imagination here is rule-governed, social, and quasi-perceptual. Walton dissolves the classic binary of real vs. unreal, replacing it with degrees of participation in generated worlds.

To develop these claims, we move through three moments: the Romantic foundation (Coleridge), the phenomenological turn (Bachelard, Ricoeur), and the aesthetic-pragmatic extension (Iser, Walton). Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s distinction between fancy and imagination remains the inaugural gesture of modern poetics. In Biographia Literaria (1817), he defines the primary imagination as “the living Power and prime Agent of all human Perception” (Coleridge, 1983, p. 304). Imagination is not a faculty among others; it is the transcendental condition for synthesizing sensory manifold into coherent objects.

Where Coleridge emphasizes imagination as synthesis , Bachelard emphasizes eruption . Yet both agree: imagination precedes and shapes reflective thought. 4. Hermeneutic Turn: Ricoeur’s Poetics of Metaphor and Narrative Paul Ricoeur synthesizes Romantic and phenomenological threads into a linguistic-hermeneutic framework. In The Rule of Metaphor (1975) and Time and Narrative (1983–85), he argues that imagination is the capacity to see as —to redescribe reality under novel categories. poetics of imagination

Abstract: This paper argues that imagination is not merely a psychological faculty but a poetic one—that is, a formative, world-disclosing power that operates through figuration, narrative, and aesthetic form. Drawing on Romantic, phenomenological, and poststructuralist traditions (Coleridge, Bachelard, Ricoeur, and Iser), the paper traces how imagination mediates between sensation and signification, absence and presence. It concludes that the poetics of imagination is fundamentally an ethics of world-making: the capacity to reconfigure reality through symbolic action. 1. Introduction: The Two Faces of Imagination Imagination has long been philosophy’s unruly guest. Plato banished it from the ideal state as a copy of a copy; Aristotle cautiously rehabilitated it as the phantasma necessary for thought. In modernity, however, imagination becomes a site of both epistemological crisis and creative liberation. The “poetics of imagination” names the study of how imagination operates not as passive fantasy but as an active, structuring force—one that shapes language, perception, and collective meaning.

If perception itself is already imaginative, then realism is a specific stylistic effect, not a ground. The poetics of imagination thus undermines any naive copy-theory of art. 3. The Phenomenological Extension: Bachelard and the Material Image Gaston Bachelard shifts the focus from cognitive synthesis to affective , spatial images. In The Poetics of Space (1958), he asks: how does a house, a drawer, a nest generate reverie? His method is topoanalysis —the systematic study of intimate spaces as they appear in poetry. Kendall Walton’s Mimesis as Make-Believe (1990) offers a

As Adriana Cavarero (2016) notes, narrative imagination is the basis for recognizing the other’s singularity. And as Black radical tradition teaches (from Douglass to Glissant), imagination is the weapon of the unfree: to imagine a world without slavery was already to begin its abolition.

Reverie as a distinct imaginative mode—neither dream (unconscious) nor calculation (conscious). Reverie allows the self to become “transparent to its own imagination.” The poetics of imagination is therefore a practice of receptivity : the poet lends words to the image’s own force. Walton dissolves the classic binary of real vs

In The Rime of the Ancient Mariner , the albatross is not merely a bird but a “Christian soul” because the poem’s imaginative logic fuses natural and moral orders. Coleridge shows that poetic imagination works by coalescing heterogeneous domains—a precursor to conceptual metaphor theory.

For Ricoeur, a live metaphor does not simply replace a literal term; it creates a semantic impertinence that forces us to restructure semantic fields. “Time is a beggar” (Rilke) is not a substitution but a new predication. Imagination is the operation of grasping this new resemblance in the absence of literal similarity.