The full course is on YouTube. He provides a GitHub repo with all code and exercise starter files. No paywall, no email signup required. The Not-So-Good (Weaknesses) 1. The pace is slow for anyone with experience If you’ve already seen another JS tutorial or know basic programming, the first 2-3 hours will feel painfully slow. He repeats concepts multiple times.
No hyperactive jump cuts, no loud background music, no "smash that like button" every 2 minutes. Just a clear voice, good pacing, and on-screen code.
If you’re starting from zero and you’re willing to pause, type, and repeat, you will come out of this course . No tutorial hell. No copy-paste without understanding. supersimpledev js
The video is just his screen, a code editor, and his voice. No animations, no fancy slides. Some people find it dry. If you need visual flair to stay engaged, this might feel like a lecture.
He uses modern features like let/const , arrow functions, and template literals, but doesn't spend much time on destructuring, spread/rest, modules, or classes. Again, this is intentional for beginners, but worth noting. The full course is on YouTube
He doesn’t use shortcuts or libraries early on. You write document.querySelector manually. You build a calculator with pure JS before ever touching React. This builds deep understanding.
Every 5-10 minutes, he pauses and says, "Your turn. Try to do X." Then he shows the solution. This spaced repetition is rare in free tutorials and highly effective. The Not-So-Good (Weaknesses) 1
For example, he explains how this works in event listeners but doesn’t dive into execution context, call/apply/bind, or lexical scoping nuances. That’s fine for a beginner course, but intermediate learners will want more.