Taboo I-ii-iii-iv -1979-1985- -

Taboo II is a more polished, but less interesting, film. The taboo is no longer a shocking revelation but an established genre trope. The film introduces a new dynamic: the "cool" aunt figure who initiates the nephew. Dorothy LeMay is fine, but she lacks Parker’s gravitas. The best scenes remain those with Parker, particularly a moment where she lectures her sister about the dangers of desire—a scene dripping with ironic hypocrisy. The production values are higher (better sets, less grain), but the psychological rawness is diluted. It’s still a decent adult drama, but you can feel the franchise shifting from "art film" to "series product."

What makes the first film remarkable is its restraint—at least for the first hour. Stevens shoots the film like a low-budget drama. The lighting is moody, the dialogue is stilted but earnest, and Parker’s performance is genuinely affecting. She doesn’t play a vixen; she plays a tired, sensual, emotionally starved woman. The famous seduction scene, where she hesitates, cries, and then surrenders, is uncomfortable in the best way. It captures the very real psychological friction of the premise. The sex scenes, by modern standards, are soft-focused and unhurried. This isn't gonzo; it's psychodrama. The film’s success—both critical and commercial—hinged entirely on Kay Parker’s ability to make you feel the guilt as much as the pleasure. She is the soul of the series. Without her, the taboo is just a gimmick. Taboo I-II-III-IV -1979-1985-

The inevitable sequel arrives three years later. With the first film a surprise hit, Taboo II faces a classic problem: how to top the original incest? The solution is to widen the net. Kay Parker returns as Barbara, but this time the plot involves her younger sister (Dorothy LeMay) and a complicated web involving the sister’s stepson. Taboo II is a more polished, but less interesting, film