The diplomatic community has begun to take the matter seriously. Behind closed doors at the UN last month, the Greek ambassador circulated a non-paper proposing a “Framework for the Neutral Treatment of Ancient Conquerors,” which would bar any state from using a dead historical figure as a “tool of contemporary territorial or cultural aggression.”
— The World News
She was not looking at North Macedonia, but at a new documentary funded by a private consortium in the Republic of North Macedonia (formerly just “Macedonia,” a name dispute that took nearly three decades to resolve). The film, The King Who Was Not Greek , marshals fringe archaeological theories suggesting Alexander’s mother, Olympias, had Illyrian (proto-Balkan) roots, and that his court spoke a now-extinct language unrelated to classical Greek. The diplomatic community has begun to take the
Meanwhile, a private American salvage company, Amphipolis Holdings LLC, has quietly secured exploration permits from Egypt’s Ministry of Antiquities to conduct ground-penetrating radar scans beneath the modern city of Alexandria. Their spokesperson declined to comment, but a leaked investor prospectus described the potential find as “the single most valuable unclaimed archaeological asset on Earth.” Last year, a Bulgarian historian published a genetic
But the conflict isn’t just regional. Enter North Macedonia’s powerful neighbor to the east: Bulgaria. Last year, a Bulgarian historian published a genetic analysis of skeletal remains from a 4th-century BC grave near the modern town of Sandanski, claiming “significant Thracian lineage markers” consistent with Alexander’s described appearance. The Bulgarian Ministry of Culture quietly funded a follow-up study, prompting an official protest from Athens and a formal letter from North Macedonia’s prime minister demanding access to the data. “That makes him ours.”
The unlikeliest claimant, however, may be Iran. In a little-noticed 2019 speech, a mid-level Iranian cleric argued that Alexander (whom Persian tradition calls “the Accursed” for burning Persepolis) was “a Zoroastrian by action, if not by name,” citing his respect for Persian satraps and his marriage to Roxana, a Bactrian princess. The cleric suggested that Alexander’s soul, if not his bones, belongs to the Iranian cultural sphere. “He destroyed our empire, then became it,” the cleric said. “That makes him ours.”